Volendam operate as a modest offensive unit struggling with defensive solidity, posting just 1.38 xG for whilst conceding 1.75 per match—a profile that mirrors their inconsistent recent run of one win, two draws and two losses across five fixtures. Their underlying metrics suggest vulnerability to teams with clinical finishing, whilst their own limited attacking output constrains ceiling potential in favourable matchups. With no imminent fixture in the current window, the model will sharpen as the schedule clarifies; historically, Bawler's banker selections on Volendam have converted at 60 per cent, indicating reasonable predictability in their most heavily-backed scenarios.
How to read this: the green bar shows the average goals Volendam were expected to score per match (their xG output). The red bar shows what opponents are expected to score against them. The diamond on each bar marks the NETHERLANDS: Eredivisie average — if the bar extends past the diamond, Volendam are above average there.
How to read this: the solid line is the goals Volendam actually scored each match. The dashed line is the goals the model expected them to score (xG). When the solid line is above the dashed, they overperformed — they finished better than the chances they created suggested. When it's below, they underperformed. Persistent underperformance often regresses; a one-off gap usually doesn't.
How to read this: each tile is one settled match, most recent first. Green = win, amber = draw, red = loss. Numbers show the actual scoreline from Volendam's perspective. Tap a tile to see Bawler's full prediction for that match.
When Bawler issues a Banker pick on a Volendam fixture, the model lands 3 out of 5 (60%). Every pick is logged before kickoff and settled publicly.