RB Salzburg beat Mjällby AIF 3–0. Bawler's model had RB Salzburg in front at 50% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.1 goals and the match produced 3. RB Salzburg had 16 shots (7 on target) to Mjällby AIF's 3 (2), with 69% of the ball against 31%. Expected goals finished 1.6 to 0.1.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Shots and corners are not shown for this fixture — we do not have enough counted matches for these sides yet.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
No first-half forecast for this fixture.
RB Salzburg beat Mjällby AIF 3–0. Bawler's model had RB Salzburg in front at 50% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.1 goals and the match produced 3. RB Salzburg had 16 shots (7 on target) to Mjällby AIF's 3 (2), with 69% of the ball against 31%. Expected goals finished 1.6 to 0.1.
RB Salzburg 3–0 Mjällby AIF, played on 27 Aug 2026 in the Europe: Europa League - Qualification. Bawler's model had gone into it with RB Salzburg 50%, the draw 24% and Mjällby AIF 25%.
Full-time: Possession 69%–31%, Expected goals (xG) 1.6–0.1, Shots 16–3, Shots on target 7–2, Shots inside box 8–1, Big chances 4–0, Corners 7–0, Saves 2–3, Fouls 5–10, Offsides 0–1, Yellow cards 0–3.
No. It finished 3–0, so Mjällby AIF failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 59% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said RB Salzburg or draw 75%, it finished RB Salzburg won (50% called); Total goals — we said 3.1, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 59%, it finished No; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 81%, it finished Landed; Second pick — we said RB Salzburg to win 50%, it finished Landed.