Uzbekistan beat Iran 3–1. Bawler's model favoured Iran at 54% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Uzbekistan 24%. It forecast 3.6 goals and the match produced 4. Uzbekistan had 7 shots (7 on target) to Iran's 3 (1), with 48% of the ball against 52%.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Second-half goals are our full-match forecast minus our first half. Shots and corners are not shown for this match — one of these national teams has too few recorded games for us to forecast them.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
Chance of at least one goal before half-time: 80%
Shots and corners are not shown for international matches yet — national teams play too few games for us to forecast them well.
Uzbekistan beat Iran 3–1. Bawler's model favoured Iran at 54% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Uzbekistan 24%. It forecast 3.6 goals and the match produced 4. Uzbekistan had 7 shots (7 on target) to Iran's 3 (1), with 48% of the ball against 52%.
Uzbekistan 3–1 Iran, played on 24 Sept 2026 in the World: International Friendly. Bawler's model had gone into it with Uzbekistan 24%, the draw 22% and Iran 54%.
Full-time: Possession 48%–52%, Shots 7–3, Shots on target 7–1, Corners 3–1, Yellow cards 3–3.
Yes — both Uzbekistan and Iran scored, finishing 3–1. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 68% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said Iran or draw 76%, it finished Uzbekistan won (24% called); Total goals — we said 3.6, it finished 4; Both teams to score — we said 68%, it finished Yes; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 88%, it finished Landed; Second pick — we said Iran to win 54%, it finished Missed.