NEC Nijmegen beat Willem II 4–1. Bawler's model favoured Willem II at 42% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave NEC Nijmegen 27%. It forecast 2.8 goals; the match produced 5. Willem II had 9 shots (2 on target) to NEC Nijmegen's 21 (10), with 32% of the ball against 68%. Expected goals finished 1.5 to 3.0.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Shots and corners are not shown for this fixture — we do not have enough counted matches for these sides yet.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
No first-half forecast for this fixture.
NEC Nijmegen beat Willem II 4–1. Bawler's model favoured Willem II at 42% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave NEC Nijmegen 27%. It forecast 2.8 goals; the match produced 5. Willem II had 9 shots (2 on target) to NEC Nijmegen's 21 (10), with 32% of the ball against 68%. Expected goals finished 1.5 to 3.0.
Willem II 1–4 NEC Nijmegen, played on 15 Aug 2026 in the NETHERLANDS: Eredivisie. Bawler's model had gone into it with Willem II 42%, the draw 31% and NEC Nijmegen 27%.
Full-time: Possession 32%–68%, Expected goals (xG) 1.5–3.0, Shots 9–21, Shots on target 2–10, Shots inside box 7–12, Big chances 2–7, Corners 1–2, Saves 6–1, Fouls 10–14, Offsides 0–3, Yellow cards 1–0.
Yes — both Willem II and NEC Nijmegen scored, finishing 1–4. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 56% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said Willem II or draw 73%, it finished NEC Nijmegen won (27% called); Total goals — we said 2.8, it finished 5; Both teams to score — we said 56%, it finished Yes; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 83%, it finished Landed.