Racing Genk beat KV Kortrijk 3–0. Bawler's model had Racing Genk in front at 73% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.2 goals and the match produced 3. Racing Genk had 13 shots (6 on target) to KV Kortrijk's 8 (1), with 63% of the ball against 37%. Expected goals finished 1.8 to 0.6.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Second-half goals are our full-match forecast minus our first half.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
Chance of at least one goal before half-time: 76%
First-half numbers are our full-match forecast split by how much of each side's shooting and corners usually comes before the break. The small bars under each number are that side's most recent first halves (up to six).
Racing Genk beat KV Kortrijk 3–0. Bawler's model had Racing Genk in front at 73% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.2 goals and the match produced 3. Racing Genk had 13 shots (6 on target) to KV Kortrijk's 8 (1), with 63% of the ball against 37%. Expected goals finished 1.8 to 0.6.
Racing Genk 3–0 KV Kortrijk, played on 10 Oct 2026 in the Belgium: Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Racing Genk 73%, the draw 17% and KV Kortrijk 10%.
Full-time: Possession 63%–37%, Expected goals (xG) 1.8–0.6, Shots 13–8, Shots on target 6–1, Shots inside box 8–4, Big chances 4–2, Corners 6–4, Saves 1–4, Fouls 10–10, Offsides 3–0, Yellow cards 1–3, Red cards 0–1.
No. It finished 3–0, so KV Kortrijk failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 50% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said Racing Genk to win 73%, it finished Racing Genk won (73% called); Total goals — we said 3.2, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 50%, it finished No.