World Cup 2026 — kicks off 11 June.See predictions →
Bawler / England: Premier League / Leeds
Leeds crest

Leeds

England: Premier League

Leeds operate as a controlled attacking side with modest output (1.61 xG per match) offset by a relatively stable defence (1.30 xGa), suggesting a team built on efficiency rather than dominance. Recent form has been strong, recording four wins across their last seven league fixtures with only one defeat, though the occasional draw hints at inconsistency in converting chances. With no immediate fixture in the prediction window, the focus remains on identifying value in their next assignment once scheduled. Bawler's model has proven reliable on Leeds' matches, delivering a 71% hit rate on banker selections, suggesting our Poisson framework captures their underlying structure well.

> Attack vs Defence (xG per match)
Goals scored (xG)1.59+0.14 vs league
Goals conceded (xG)1.300.17 vs league
◇ = England: Premier League average. Lower xG conceded is better.

How to read this: the green bar shows the average goals Leeds were expected to score per match (their xG output). The red bar shows what opponents are expected to score against them. The diamond on each bar marks the England: Premier League average — if the bar extends past the diamond, Leeds are above average there.

> xG performance · last 8 matches
0123vs Brentford: actual 0, xG 1.52@ West Ham: actual 3, xG 1.35vs Wolverhampton: actual 3, xG 1.81@ Chelsea: actual 0, xG 1.20vs Burnley: actual 3, xG 2.36@ Tottenham: actual 1, xG 1.55vs Brighton: actual 1, xG 1.51@ West Ham: actual 0, xG 1.45Brentf@West HWolver@ChelseBurnle@TottenBright@West H
Goals scoredModel xGAggregate -1.7 goals vs xG (-0.22/game)

How to read this: the solid line is the goals Leeds actually scored each match. The dashed line is the goals the model expected them to score (xG). When the solid line is above the dashed, they overperformed — they finished better than the chances they created suggested. When it's below, they underperformed. Persistent underperformance often regresses; a one-off gap usually doesn't.

> What the data says
Solid defensively
Conceding 1.30 xG per match · -0.17 vs league average of 1.47.
Bawler's edge: Result
Banker picks in this market land 75% of the time on Leeds fixtures (3/4).
Tough market: Goals (Over/Under)
Leeds matches give Bawler a harder read here — 1/3 (33%). Approach with caution.
> Form · last 5
Overall: 4W / 2D / 2L · Avg goals 1.4 for, 1.0 against

How to read this: each tile is one settled match, most recent first. Green = win, amber = draw, red = loss. Numbers show the actual scoreline from Leeds's perspective. Tap a tile to see Bawler's full prediction for that match.

Matches Covered
8
8 settled
Avg xG Scored
1.59
per match
Avg xG Conceded
1.30
per match
Banker Hit Rate
63%
5/8 picks
> Bawler's Banker picks on Leeds matches
63%
hit rate over 8 picks

When Bawler issues a Banker pick on a Leeds fixture, the model lands 5 out of 8 (63%). Every pick is logged before kickoff and settled publicly.

> Bawler's record on Leeds by market
Result75%3/4
Goals (Over/Under)33%1/3

How to read this: each row groups settled Banker picks Bawler issued on Leeds fixtures by market type, so you can see where the model has the strongest read on this team. Higher hit rate = more reliable category for Leeds matches.

> Recent matches (last 8)

> More from Bawler