World Cup 2026 — kicks off 11 June.See predictions →
Bawler / USA: MLS / New England Revolution
New England Revolution crest

New England Revolution

USA: MLS

New England Revolution operate as a perfectly balanced attacking unit, generating 1.32 xG per match whilst conceding 1.35, suggesting they thrive in open play rather than domination. Their recent run of four wins in six games reflects clinical finishing from a team that creates genuine chances rather than relying on set pieces or defensive solidity. With no immediate fixtures on the horizon, this data window represents a stable profile for midweek or weekend deployment. Bawler's Banker picks on Revolution matches have converted at 50%, indicating the model performs reliably on their tight margins.

> Attack vs Defence (xG per match)
Goals scored (xG)1.32-0.14 vs league
Goals conceded (xG)1.380.05 vs league
◇ = USA: MLS average. Lower xG conceded is better.

How to read this: the green bar shows the average goals New England Revolution were expected to score per match (their xG output). The red bar shows what opponents are expected to score against them. The diamond on each bar marks the USA: MLS average — if the bar extends past the diamond, New England Revolution are above average there.

> xG performance · last 7 matches
0123@ St. Louis City: actual 1, xG 0.86vs Columbus Crew: actual 2, xG 1.20vs Charlotte: actual 1, xG 1.78vs Philadelphia Union: actual 2, xG 1.28vs Nashville: actual 0, xG 1.37vs Minnesota United: actual 2, xG 1.41@ Charlotte: actual 0, xG 1.31@St. LoColumbCharloPhiladNashviMinnes@Charlo
Goals scoredModel xGAggregate -1.2 goals vs xG (-0.17/game)

How to read this: the solid line is the goals New England Revolution actually scored each match. The dashed line is the goals the model expected them to score (xG). When the solid line is above the dashed, they overperformed — they finished better than the chances they created suggested. When it's below, they underperformed. Persistent underperformance often regresses; a one-off gap usually doesn't.

> What the data says
Tough market: Goals (Over/Under)
New England Revolution matches give Bawler a harder read here — 1/3 (33%). Approach with caution.
> Form · last 5
Overall: 4W / 0D / 3L · Avg goals 1.1 for, 1.4 against

How to read this: each tile is one settled match, most recent first. Green = win, amber = draw, red = loss. Numbers show the actual scoreline from New England Revolution's perspective. Tap a tile to see Bawler's full prediction for that match.

Matches Covered
7
7 settled
Avg xG Scored
1.32
per match
Avg xG Conceded
1.38
per match
Banker Hit Rate
43%
3/7 picks
> Bawler's Banker picks on New England Revolution matches
43%
hit rate over 7 picks

When Bawler issues a Banker pick on a New England Revolution fixture, the model lands 3 out of 7 (43%). This sits below the cross-league baseline — the model finds this team harder to read than most. Every pick is logged before kickoff and settled publicly.

> Bawler's record on New England Revolution by market
Result50%2/4
Goals (Over/Under)33%1/3

How to read this: each row groups settled Banker picks Bawler issued on New England Revolution fixtures by market type, so you can see where the model has the strongest read on this team. Higher hit rate = more reliable category for New England Revolution matches.

> Recent matches (last 7)

> More from Bawler